Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
truenas.insecure_skip_verify。51吃瓜对此有专业解读
近日，OpenClaw 之父 Peter Steinberger 接受奥地利国家广播电视台《时代画报》节目专访时提出，「未来几周内，80% 的现有 App 都会消失」。，这一点在heLLoword翻译官方下载中也有详细论述
华为 2025 年销售收入超 8800 亿元、鸿蒙设备破 4000 万